Well, my prints didn’t warrant a merit this year. The good news is that I didn’t cry.  Seriously, though. I can’t break that 77 barrier and I thought I had a really good chance for this print competition.

WPPI 16×20 Print Competition

Bride or Groom Alone: Non-Wedding Day. This image scored a 77. The judges’ critique was that the lighting was flat, and they didn’t feel that the facial expressions were quite right. They suggested that I should have  intoroduced some artificial lighting into the scene and shot “lots and lots” of images until I captured the perfect facial expressions. I do agree with the lighting, but I don’t agree with the facial expressions. I think my subject’s face expresses happiness and joy.

wppi_annual_16x20_print_comp_4S1_5429_creative_bridal
wppi_annual_16x20_print_comp_4S1_7564-Edit

This series of images was shot on a slope and that made post processing a little difficult for me in that, if I kept the slope in the image, it appeared that I shot this with a crooked horizon. Making the horizon a straighter line added a lot of duplicate cloning in the foreground which is now very evident to me. I may try to replicate this composite in the future and improve on all these points.High School Seniors. This image scored a 76. Upon entering, I knew I was taking a chance with the subject’s arm not being bent. Straight limbs are usually a no-no, but rules are meant to be broken. I did have a few other poses of this setup, but this one—with the straight arm, captivated me the most. It looked relaxed, and non-posed. I went with it and it was probably a bad decision because the judges did not like it. They did not like the pose, they said it looked unnatural. The also commented that the water was blown out. I’m not sure I agree with either, but art is subjective, so whatcha gonna do?

High School Seniors. This image scored a 75. This image was the very first image of the category and I think it may have been judged a little harshly because of that. The judges commented on the brightness of the water in the upper left-hand corner and wanted to see more of my subject’s mouth. In retrospect, I should have cloned in some darker water in that corner, but I kind of like the fact that I only see the upper lip and that it’s mirrored in the water.

wppi_annual_16x20_print_comp_4S1_9535-Edit

All-in-all, I respect the judges’ decisions, but I do think this is a very hard game to play. While one image may get judged harshly for breaking a rule, such as limbs cropped incorrectly for example, another image may score really well but have committed the same infraction. I just have to keep trying to reach my goal.

I did have a bit of a revelation during the first day of judging. Looking at all the magnificent images in the competition, I realized something. My revelation is that I should shoot specifically for competition. Instead of trying to garner competition images from my paid client shoots, I should rather try to produce a competition-worthy image from a styled and planned shoot with something very specific in mind. Client shoots are pretty stressful trying to get all the wardrobe changes and props incorporated, while still trying to produce multiple images the client will love. I think if I were to narrow down my goals for a shoot, ie. one or two specific images, I would have to time to tweak it and work out all the kinks that would prevent it from doing well in competition. Time to start brainstorming.

The post, The Annual WPPI 16×20 Print Competition 2016, first appeared on Ata-Girl Photography Co.’s website and blog. Please feel free to comment here, or share this post with your friends via Facebook, Twitter or Pinterest. Please email me if you have any questions about this article or want to share a neat idea for a future blog post with me.